Last night, July 26, 2026, I hosted a one-hour livestream—my 300th livestream.
The livestream reached 10,000 impressions, with 518 viewers. The average watch time was 1.29 minutes, the average concurrent viewership was 11, the peak concurrent viewership was 22, and I gained 7 new followers.
The metrics for this livestream weren’t particularly impressive, but receiving three positive reviews was a real highlight—and the fact that these three reviews were for different steel grades was a pleasant little surprise.
:Positive Review 1: I’ve used your 8566 and DC53, and they’re really good;
Positive Review 2: The 8566 is unbeatable for cutting thick materials.
Positive Review 3: I’ve also used the LG—it’s great for side-cutting motor housings and resists chipping very well.
These positive reviews aren’t just casual praise; they represent users’ actual experiences after use. They reflect the product’s quality and performance, making them both valuable and hard to come by.
They say the first purchase is based on perception, while the second is based on actual experience. It’s no small feat for customers to share their post-use experiences with you, and it’s only through the livestream that I can get this firsthand feedback. So even though the livestream metrics weren’t spectacular, receiving three positive reviews based on actual usage makes this livestream well worth it.
That said, even though I mentioned the livestream metrics weren’t spectacular, I’m actually satisfied with the results: 10,000 impressions and 518 viewers.
For a livestream about mold steel, reaching 10,000 impressions is already quite remarkable. To put it bluntly, even if you set up an exhibition booth, you might not necessarily attract 10,000 visitors to your booth, nor would more than 500 people engage with you for even a minute. So, I’m thoroughly satisfied with these livestream metrics.
*************
Wu Dejian’s tool steel, the chief of staff of the user, bought everything he had used.